|

Speculative Praxis Towards a Queer Feminist Digital Archive a collaborative research-creation project

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 1   

Version of Record: Cowan, T.L., McLeod, Dayna, & Rault, Jasmine (2014). Speculative praxis towards a queer feminist digital archive: A collaborative research-creation project. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No.5. doi:10.7264/N3PZ573Z

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0  

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 1 Meoww Cat Image

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 1 A note on form: While the project reveals our process through the tracked comments and changes and these ‘tracks’ come with our solo-authorial names, many of these comments are also collaborative and come from our conversations over the years.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 Dropbox full of track changes

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 This process document is dedicated to chronicling the challenge of creating digital spaces that can house and encourage feminist, transgender and queer cultural and affective archives. Following recent critical digital humanities studies (including Drucker 2009 and McPherson 2012) we recognize that such a task involves rethinking the logic of computational design and reshaping the existing architectures of digital space in order to accommodate and enable the intra-active knowledges, feelings, social lives, politics and cultural productions that trans- feminists and queers [1] value (Barad 2007). With Johanna Drucker, we are drawn to the “speculative” in order to reflect our concerns about the ways in which the inconvenient and persistent complexities of humanities-based trans- feminist and queer epistemologies run the risk of being subordinated to the technical limitations of what is “possible” in a digital environment. Indeed, striving towards the impossible is often the only survival strategy that queerness knows (Muñoz, 2009).[2]

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 1 The impossible project that we have been labouring towards is a digital environment designed to house, enable and support the translocal, networked and affective sharing of histories of feminist and queer artist and activist cultural production throughout (at least) North America – that is, the space known as Canada, the US and Mexico. We envision a collaborative, interactive, user-generated “memories and feelings bank” and gossip rag for feminist and queer artists and audiences; a space that would collect and generate diverse and trans-disciplinary modes of feminist and queer knowing, that would transform the temporality of these ephemeral and affective traces into the potentially-historical. We received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for a project that we called  “Feeling Speculative in Digital Space: Building a Feminist and Queer Digital Archive and Anecdotal Encyclopedia.” Our grant proposal promised a ‘proof-of-concept’ as well as the development of a pilot project for an integrated, user-generated, open source platform called “The Cabaret Commons.” This task has proven much more complicated than we had expected.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 4 Because none of us are proficient coders, we have chosen to experiment with Scalar, the humanities-oriented open-source publishing platform, as a potential laboratory in which to experiment with linking our archival materials  with our online database housed by the Canadian Writing Research Collaboratory (CWRC) where the material is physically/digitally housed. Here, we will document and discuss our first major steps in the process of working between Scalar and CWRC, of building a sort of mixed-use (part built, “maker”-curated part user-generated, user-curated) digital archive that we envision, or as Diana Taylor has called it, an “anti-archival” (2012) space, one which shifts access and expertise into, conceivably, the hands of the many, rather than under the control of a few.  And while we had originally envisioned a highly interactive proof-of-concept, it turns out that we are actually quite far away from the user-generated model we hoped for. [3] But for the moment, this process document can gesture to the collective/multi-user effort —the speculative impulse, wish list and trouble-shooting/accountability politics – in the “making of Cabaret Commons.”

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 3 Therefore, as a first step, we are starting with a collection of materials related to Meow Mix, an almost-monthly cabaret and dance party “for bent girls and their buddies,” which ran in Montreal from 1997-2012. We have decided to start with this collection for a few reasons: first, because the Meow Mix materials have been at least partially collected and digitized for the recent Meow Mix Retrospective at RATS 9 gallery in Montreal (Jan 11-Feb 2, 2013, by Sasha La Photographe); second, because we have each participated in the Meow Mix scene as performer (McLeod), audience member (Rault) and researcher (Cowan) and can contribute a definitive structuring complexity to this project through our multiple locations within the social, political, intellectual, labour and desire matrix of this scene.  Treating the Meow Mix Retrospective as a case study, we want to think about how these materials might also have a digital existence and what a process-reflective digital praxis would involve. By foregrounding the digitizing process we will think not only about trouble-shooting questions of—and imagining solutions for—description, access, preservation, compatibility, and obsolescence, but will also grapple with what we call, riffing on Karen Barad, the “aesthetica-erotica-ethico-onto-epistem-ological” (185) implications of digitization. [4] That is, how do we imagine a digital (anti) archive that will animate the artistic, cultural, social, political, sexual, knowledge and subject experiments and possibilities opened up (and foreclosed) by a phenomenon like Meow Mix? How do we realize this impossible imaginary within Scalar – a platform designed less as a collaborative authoring or archiving tool than as a flexible publishing platform for multi-medial “born digital scholarship”? And what are the implications of the demand made by the digitizing process [5] [6] [7] [8] that, as Taylor notes, “every-thing/practice be transformed into an object and tagged” (2012)?

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 3 This essay sets out to do three things: 1) provide an introduction to our copious and entangled object of study and its related documents? that is the Meow Mix cabaret (just one of the very many complicated objects of study that make up feminist and queer cabaret scenes around Canada, the US and Mexico); 2) give a sense of the digitizing process in CWRC and Scalar; and 3) acknowledge the asymmetrically valued labours we experience in this project. This “paper” foregrounds the collaborative process of feminist and queer scene-making, archiving and the digital labours involved in their after-lives.  Rather than resolve the many paradoxes that we encounter along the way, we intend to accumulate and articulate—to gather and extend—to attend to them. We will take advantage of Ada’s online format to include links to selected materials from the Meow Mix archive that have been uploaded to our CWRC institutional server, as well as trans-medial reflections on the process of working within the Scalar platform —i.e., screencasts/grabs of our trial-runs at ordering, networking, tagging and visualizing content, highlighting and thematizing our mistakes along the way as we make up the ‘rules’ for our projectand begin to produce The Cabaret Commons based on these materials. [9] Through this process we will document our thinking towards designing digital space that does not collapse, or render invisible, the complexities and contradictions of both the digitizing process itself and of the feminist and queer performances that we seek to “preserve.”[10] This process-document/installation seeks to make transparent the polyvocal nature of collaboration and, rather than synthesizing our ideas into a single authorial voice, to literally “track” the ways that we interact with the project.

 Guiding Questions

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 2 How do we acknowledge within the project the compulsion/pressure to the digital in our academic and artistic fields and institutions? How can a digital space account for the scene that Meow Mix created and which extended well beyond the “event-ness” of these nights (Bauman 1986)? How do we provide space for the innumerable, uncollected absences within the Meow Mix Retrospective and later unfolding digital archive? What is the labour of being studied, or, how much work do these performers, photographers and videographers need to commit to the project for us to be able to use their materials? Do we expect to use this labour and acquire these materials for free? Whose interests would this online archive serve? How do we point to the specificity of Montreal as an endroit, or place/scene, while also signaling the ways that Meow Mix functioned as a destination for international cabaret artists, and was in conversation with feminist and queer shows and parties across North America and beyond? How do we engage in a discussion of the pervasive whiteness of this show and its scene?

Meow Mix December 12, 2009 (T.L.’s recollections)

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 9:15 pm The Sala Rossa on St. Laurent Boulevard in Montreal is dimly lit. The stage curtain is drawn. Tables and chairs are arranged through the middle of the room. Along the sides of the room, short rows of folding chairs have been set up, all angling toward the auditorium stage at the front. DJ Noisy Nora is sitting in the booth in the rear left corner of the room, playing upbeat music that sets a celebratory tone without dominating the room. Most of the tables have people sitting at them, and there are , saving seats for friends. Most of the chairs on the wings are still vacant [17] [18] [19]. JR and I [20] put our coats on two chairs and head to the bar. A sexy grouch bartender ignores us for a while.[21] Eventually she serves us our beers and we lean against the bar to check out the scene. The room is gradually filling up with the show’s audience: mostly-white, mostly-queer [22] [23] [24] [25], mostly-women mingle around or sit at tables. Almost everyone is talking to someone. There are a few solo folks sitting in chairs on the wings. The age-range in the room seems pretty broad: there are folks in their twenties, and queers in their fifties (and everything in between).[26]

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 At 10 the show starts. The emcee for the night, Duchess Jack [28] (from the drag troupe, The Dukes of Drag)[29], wears a pair of cut-off jeans, a red flannel shirt worn open and cut-off at the sleeves, a carpenter’s belt, a pair of work boots, and a long wig. The acts for the night include an opening drag number by Stephan LeDude, followed by Rhema the Hairdresser, who does “Caribbean-influenced stand-up comedy” and who introduces herself by telling the audience that she is 57-years old; there is also a solo dance piece by “Emilie Legs,”[30] which features an elaborate fisting sequence; Clara Furey[31] plays a set on the piano and then sings a couple of songs; a burlesque dancer—Kitty Van Dyke; and Patsy and Kathy[32], a duo performing a hilarious dance/clown number to Hall & Oats’ “Man Eater.” The show finishes with the drag stylings of Pat McCrotch & Eddi Licious. It’s likely that there were other acts[35] of which I did not make note, since I often get distracted at these events[33][34][36]. Throughout the show the audience cheers loudly, whistles, laughs, calls taunts—especially to the emcee—and many people get up to get drinks from the bar at the back of the room. Between each act the emcee arrives onstage to thank the last performer and introduce the next, to give the audience information about upcoming shows, and when the show wraps up just before 11, Duchess Jack encourages the audience to help move the tables and chairs to the sides of the room so that the dance party can start. DJ Noisy Nora starts the music again, and now it is definitely not background music; it is dance music. People pitch in to transform the room from cabaret to dance hall (and it is convenient and appropriate that the venue, the Sala Rossa is both). Before all of the tables and chairs have been cleared, people start dancing. Throughout the course of the show, many more people have arrived, and by the end of the show the back of the room is filled with people standing, watching the last acts, waiting for the dance party to begin.

16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 This is Montreal’s Meow Mix, a cabaret and dance party “for bent girls and their buddies” curated and produced by Miriam Ginestier from 1997-2012 (description previously published in Cowan 2010.)

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 5 We want to make it easier for people to write critically, creatively, socially, nostalgically and angrily about work like the performer and audience labours of Meow Mix, to make the materials accessible and to make the proliferation of knowledges[37] that these materials enabled more available, to preserve past and present performances for future audiences. We want to use digital space to expand the moment of relevance of these mostly one-off performances and to document these performance/activist practices that seem to hang so precariously on the edge of our fragile memories, and to document the social-sexual-political scenes that co-emerge with these performances.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 1 We struggle to imagine what kind of digital archive[38] could accommodate[39][40] the material, ephemeral, performed, musical and affective records of that night, the many nights during its 15-year run, and then the nights these relate to in overlapping scenes across North America (across Canada, the US and Mexico).  First, of course, we need to digitize as many pieces and parts of the cabaret as we can – a performance event (made up of several smaller on-off-backstage performance events[41]) that does not lend itself easily to documentation (neither photographs nor audio/video translates the on-off-backstage social, sexual, economic, cultural, spatial and political dynamics that generate its event-ness). We get quite lucky, as a photographer (Sasha La Photographe) in Montreal has already digitized much of Miriam Ginestier’s personal archive (of mini-dv, hi-8, and VHS cassettes, posters, flyers, playbills, phone lists and email lists) and has also amassed a collection of her own digital video and photographs, some of which she shares with us (for a small fee)[42]. McLeod begins the work of uploading some of the 487.98 GB of raw data in this collection to the CWRC repository so that we can all access the files and consider how to put them into conversation on Scalar. To those of us who have never managed large quantities of online data (ie. Rault and Cowan), this might seem a relatively straightforward process, but McLeod immediately disabuses us of this naivety.

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 Cabaret Common Screen

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 1 McLeod: Working with the CWRC repository which uses Drupal (an open source content management system), I have encountered some challenges which include establishing a system of protocols for digitization and upload from the collection[44]: what files should we use in terms of image and sound quality? Do I edit for time and flow? Do I excerpt acts and moments from shows shot in their entirety into single video files? If I upload a video recording of an entire show, can I chapter-mark it (like in YouTube or Soundcloud) through CWRC? What metadata do I include with each object in CWRC? How detailed of a description do I include, or should this information be used in the front-end of the project and visible to a user/reader in Scalar[45][46][47]? Do I compress video files? Am I doing damage to the original digital object, which in some cases, are digitized versions of analog materials, by compressing it, changing its format, or otherwise editing or interfering with it? Wherever possible, I have uploaded uncompressed[48][49][50] files. However, due to size (2048mbs) and video format (mp4, avi, ogg, mov, qt, m4a) limitations that are currently in place in CWRC, I have had to compress[51] and/or reformat some of the video files[52] to accommodate these restrictions. I have also evaluated the quality of the images and overall watchability of the video material (camerawork, lighting, graininess, pixilation, sound, frame size, data rate, etc), which I recognize is inflicting personal evaluative conditions that are not necessarily best for the archive[53][54].

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 1 While the three of us (in conversation with the support team at CWRC) are working through answers[54][55] to McLeod’s questions, we are also experimenting with putting these materials to work in Scalar[56]. We were inspired by the use of dynamic mapping networked and affinity visualizations in Debra Levine’s unpublished (not-yet-public) Scalar project on ACT UP in New York City from 1987-1996, which demonstrates not only the platform’s capacity to enable authorial/curatorial interpretive pathways through textual, visual and audio digital materials and to encourage user agency to access the materials askew of the authorial/curatorial structure and to track alternative relations between the materials (through the “comments” function) (Levin, “Electrifying Bonds: Animating the Archives of ACT UP with Scalar,” unpublished conference paper, American Society for Theater Research, October 2013, http://astrdigitalmethods.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/levineastr13.pdf). Scalar’s capacity to accommodate and creatively visualize[57] affinities, connections and relationships between disparate objects, events, materials, feelings, cultures and politics seems ideally suited to the work of our project. While the platform is not explicitly designed to facilitate open/public user-generated content[58]  (a function we will need), this capacity does not seem beyond its range of possibilities[59] and for now we are compelled by the promise of what it can allow us to do with the materials we have.

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 Rault: I’ve been trying to embed the video and photographs housed in our CWRC archive into Scalar, and it just hasn’t been working. I get a message telling me that “this type of media is currently unsupported by Scalar”:

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 CABARETCOMM2

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 I worried that perhaps Scalar could only work with its “affiliated archives” or the few “other archives” that it recognizes (Prezi, Soundcloud, Vimeo, YouTube). Dayna suspected that my problem is likely the result of the URL structure from our CWRC archive, and has been in conversation with their support team to see if she (or they) can fix this. The CWRC site was not designed with photographs and videos in mind (it is primarily concerned with text-based digital archives)[60], and so it is taking longer that we had hoped to correct the problem. The team at Scalar has confirmed that our URL should ideally be standardized to reveal the file extensions — but for now we can manually create the file extension as a workaround. This is not ideal, because metadata attached to files included in the CRWC archive cannot be culled and published in Scalar. Because these manually modified URLs are apparently notoriously unstable, we will need to find[61]find a way to streamline URLs at CWRC before we generate much content on Scalar.[62]

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 These digital design logistics are very new to me, and while I’ve learned through this process that both Dayna and the support team at Scalar are extremely helpful, I’ve also recognized that Scalar is not the most intuitive platform – which suggests that it might discourage the sort of easy participation we envision as a final goal for the Cabaret Commons.[63]

Backing up again: the many timezones of this project

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 We began by interrogating our own complicity within current academic investments/incentivized priorities of the “speculative,” the “transnational” and the “digital” and the good intention of wanting to value feminist and queer affective labours within grassroots cultural scenes. However, in the process of interrogating these initial guiding concepts, we quickly had to acknowledge that the intellectual and political contexts of the project reached far beyond these three terms while finding ourselves in the position of asking for more un-remunerated affective and immaterial labour by the very artists and audiences whose labour we wanted to value in the first place[64][65].  Our (anti-racist, anti-colonial feminist queer) political/intellectual commitments brought us quickly to what seems like an unresolvable paradox[66]: we are compelled by the idea of an accessible, participatory and transformational digital architecture that can accommodate these politics and commitments as they are enacted by the dynamic scenes of performance, activism, art and scholarship.

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 1 We are also wary of the ways in which a project like ours is always already complicit in the racist, settler-colonial, expansionist violence and logics of our corporate academic industrial imperial complex that is designed to flatten, regulate and instrumentalize the “other ways to be/of being” that motivate our work. We need to foreground how this project relies on the affective, immaterial labour of artists, audiences and organizers and how our project both seeks to archive these labours and affects AND reproduce their terms. By this we mean the forms of “labour that produce… the informational and cultural content of the commodity … which require high levels of intimacy” (Lazzarato), and are driven by commitment, care, love, desire, community and community-building, but which go unrecognized, under-appreciated and un- or under-remunerated—this is affective work that is typically ignored but absolutely expected within the queer economies of world-making[67], in an analogous way to “women’s work” and now so uncannily familiar in ‘user-generated’ Web 2.0 culture. How do we account for asymmetrical affective labours of artists and audience members who are minoritized within these spaces and do the work of being the “diversity” in the room/on the stage that allows everyone who is majoritized to feel good.[68][69] What does it mean to be an audience member (of colour, trans- feminine, Indigenous or Métis, etc.) doing the work of supporting predominantly white, predominantly non-trans identified women, in a larger/broader cultural context of white supremacy and trans- misogyny? This is a very asymmetrical affective labour economy – but feminist/queer scenes demand this ‘support’ as a condition of participation – despite how unsupportive or outright hostile the scene might be for (non white, trans feminine) participants. Both compelled and repelled by our own project, we find ourselves working within a self-constructed paradox: an open, proliferating set of generative and obstructive contradictions that have become our project.

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 1 A note on form: While the project reveals our process through the tracked comments and changes and these ‘tracks’ come with our solo-authorial names, many of these comments are also collaborative and come from our conversations over the years.

Acknowledgments:

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 1 We offer our thanks to editors and reviewers who contributed thoughts and suggestions to the process of this document including Alexandra Juhasz.

Works Cited

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. 132-185.

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 Cowan, T.L. 2010. “a one-shot affair: Cabaret as Improvised Curation.” Canadian Theatre Review 143. 47-54.

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Deleuze, Gilles, Félix Guatarri and Robert Brinkley. 1983. “What is a Minor Literature?”Mississippi Review 11. “Essays Literary Criticism.” no.3: 13-33. Vol. 11, No. 3: 13-33

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Drucker, Johanna. 2009. SpecLab: digital aesthetics and projects in speculative computing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Gardner, Anthony. 2011.“Whither the Postcolonial?” Global Studies: Mapping Contemporary Art and Culture. Eds. Hans Belting, Jacob Birken, Andrea

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Buddensieg, and Peter Weibel. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz; Karlsruhe: ZKM. 142-157.

36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 0 McPherson, Tara. 2012. “Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? or, Thinking the Histories of Race & Computation.” Debates in the Digital Humanities. Ed.

37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 139- 161.

38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Muñoz, José Esteban. 1998. Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of

39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 —.       2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and Now of Queer Futurity. New York City. New York University Press.

41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 0 Taylor, Diana.  2012. “Save As.” emiférica 9. “On The Subject of Archives.” 1-2.  http://hemisphericinstitute.org/hemi/fr/e-misferica-91/taylor

42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 0  

43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 0  

44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0  

45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0  

46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0  

47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0  

48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0  

49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 0  

50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0  

51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0  

52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0  

53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 0  

54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0  

55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 0  

56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 0  

57 Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0  

58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0  

59 Leave a comment on paragraph 59 0  

60 Leave a comment on paragraph 60 0  

61 Leave a comment on paragraph 61 0  

62 Leave a comment on paragraph 62 0  

63 Leave a comment on paragraph 63 0  

64 Leave a comment on paragraph 64 0  

65 Leave a comment on paragraph 65 0  

66 Leave a comment on paragraph 66 0  

67 Leave a comment on paragraph 67 0  

68 Leave a comment on paragraph 68 0  

69 Leave a comment on paragraph 69 0  

70 Leave a comment on paragraph 70 0 [[27]] COWAN: Link crowd shots from 2008 – http://beta.cwrc.ca/islandora/object/islandora%3Acdca3766-6c61-434f-8656-1658e51a9f13 [[27]]

71 Leave a comment on paragraph 71 0 [[37]] RAULT: But have we accounted for the various knowledges produced, circulated (and suppressed) here?

72 Leave a comment on paragraph 72 0 [[43]] MCLEOD: Page 1 of 3 the database (so far) housed with CWRC. Video and images are represented equally with only their titles (that I have given each file) as labels. [[43]]

73 Leave a comment on paragraph 73 0 [[58]] MCLEOD: Are we trying to reinvent existing social media(tized) digitization and dissemination platforms (YouTube, Vimeo)? Wouldn’t it be easier to use these platforms?

74 Leave a comment on paragraph 74 0 No! Because we do not support their copyright and corporate agendas that monetize content and that could potentially jeopardize the integrity of the archive, and ultimately the Meow Mix performers, audience members, and curators who have become objects of study in this project. RAULT: Indeed, I suspect that if we wanted to make our Scalar ‘book’ project more accessible for public/user generated content, the design team at the Center for Transformative Scholarship in the Digital Age (University of Southern California) could make that happen.[[59]]

Page 50

Source: http://adareview.fembotcollective.org/ada-issue-5-queer-feminist-media-praxis/speculative-praxis-towards-a-queer-feminist-digital-archive-a-collaborative-research-creation-project/