‘It’s Just a Lot More Casual’: Young Heterosexual Women’s Experiences of Using Tinder in New Zealand

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 By Panteá Farvid and Kayla Aisher

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 Abstract: Tinder is a mobile dating app that has recently exploded among young heterosexuals. While attracting great media attention, little scholarly work exists on the topic. In this paper we begin to address this gap by reporting on a small research project that examined five young heterosexual women’s experiences of using Tinder in New Zealand. We argue that Tinder was situated within (and reproduced) a contradictory domain imbued with elements of both  pleasure and danger.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 2 Since its launch in 2013, Tinder has become one of the most widely used mobile dating apps globally (Lapowsky, 2014). Fifty million people are estimated to use Tinder across 196 countries, and the app is particularly popular among young people (Yi, 2015). Due to its huge popularity, the app has attracted great considerable attention (Newall, 2015), focusing not only on Tinder’s features, but debates about its place in society (Dating NZ, n.d.). Tinder is touted as quick and easy to set up and use, providing a fun and entertaining means of communication as well as an obligation-free platform to meet new people (Newall, 2015). Numerous success stories have also been reported, where people have found the “love of their life” via Tinder (Scribner, 2014). Alongside these positive depictions, the app is also depicted as promoting superficiality (by only focusing on physical appearance), being a ‘hook up app’ that fosters promiscuity (Dating NZ, n.d.) and increasing the spread of sexually transmitted infections (Cohen, 2015). Its use is seen as particularly dangerous for heterosexual women, resulting in reports of being raped (Hume, 2015; Hodges, 2015), being drugged and gang-raped (Leask, 2014), and even death (Vine & Prendeville, 2014). Tinder is often portrayed as a risky app that heterosexual women should treat with caution or avoid completely (De Peak, 2014), rather than emphasizing the actions of the men who perpetrate such acts or fostering a broader discussion about the high rates of violence against women.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 2 Although there has been immense media interest in Tinder, virtually no published research exists about the app. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by examining the experiences of a small group of young heterosexual women in NZ who use Tinder. We first explicate what Tinder is and how it works, followed by situating the shape of contemporary female heterosexuality which shape women’s experiences in contradictory ways. We then discuss research on technologically mediated intimacies before presenting the project details and our analysis.

What is Tinder?

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 3 Tinder is marketed as a social networking app that is typically used as a dating app or for making new friends in new places (Newall, 2015). The app is designed to be quick and easy to use, with a simple platform that is sleek and visually attractive. Using location-aware technology, Tinder links to an individual’s Facebook to create profiles consisting of a name, age, and photos, with an option of providing a short biographical blurb (Newall, 2015). The information required for setting up a Tinder profile is a vastly simplified version of what is typically required in online dating websites (where much greater detail is needed regarding one’s identity, lifestyle, hobbies, relational desires, and long-term goals). Unlike online dating, Tinder provides users the function of choosing the geographical range within which they would like to meet people, as well as providing parameters regarding age and gender. Once the app is set up, it feeds the user with a photo stream of potential matches, which they can swipe left for “no” and right for “yes”. The process is relatively anonymous as potential partners are unaware if a user has rejected them by swiping left. Matches occur when two users both swiped right, after which they have the opportunity to chat privately within the interface, and if they choose to, exchanging other contact details and eventually meeting in person.

Situating Contemporary Western Female Heterosexuality

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 1 In her highly influential work, Wendy Holloway (1989) identified three discourses governing contemporary heterosexuality (which produce different subject positions and types of power for men and women): the male sexual drive discourse, the have/hold discourse, and the permissive discourse. The male sexual drive discourse posits that men are driven by a biological necessity to procure and engage in heterosex, and once aroused must experience sexual release via coitus and orgasm. Within this discourse, women are positioned as passive and responsive to male sexuality, and as distinctly lacking a physical desire for sex. The have/hold discourse is one that draws on traditional and religious ideals to promote a conventional marriage-type heterosexual union. This discourse positions men as sex-driven and women as offering up their sexuality to men in exchange for children and the security of a home life (Hollway, 1989). Finally, the permissive discourse provides both sexes the right to express their sexuality, in any way they please, as long as it is among (consenting) adults and no one gets hurt (Braun, Gavey & McPhillips, 2003). Although this discourse is supposedly gender-blind, it is intersected by other discourses which affect men and women differently. For example, an enduring sexual double standard within society means that women are judged more harshly for engaging in casual sex or displaying an unfettered or desirous sexuality (Farvid, Braun & Rowney, 2010). Women are also often held responsible for any negative impacts that may come as a result of sexual activity (Beres & Farvid, 2010).

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 1 Over the past two decades, Western ideals around heterosexual femininity and women’s sexuality have been shifting, where desirous female sexuality, autonomy, and power have become celebrated publicly (Evans, Riley & Shankar, 2010). Women are increasingly occupying a more active, agentic, and desirous sexual subjectivity (Farvid, 2014). Amidst such positive reworkings, heterosexuality remains a perilous terrain for young women (Beres & Farvid, 2010). In what continues to be a society governed by patriarchal power relations, struggles against sexual assault and gender-based violence remain life-threatening risks for women (Gavey, 2005; Vance, 1984). At the same time as women are encouraged to explore their sexuality and be sexually active, explorative and experienced (Farvid, 2014; Farvid & Braun, 2006) they are warned against and live in a context where there are real material risks associated with doing so (Farvid & Braun 2013, 2014). The sociocultural context in which women find themselves continues to involve domains of both pleasure and danger (Farvid & Braun 2013; Vance, 1984). Such contradictions provide the backdrop within which women traverse technologically mediated domains such as online dating and mobile dating.

Technologically Mediated Intimacies: Online Dating

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 3 Online dating has steadily increased in popularity since it was first introduced in the 1990’s (Srithran, Helipern, Wibur & Gawronoski, 2009). Becoming not only increasingly socially acceptable, but the fastest growing means for couples to meet (Rosenfeld & Thomas, 2012). It is estimated that one in 10 adults have used online dating in their lifetime (Smith & Dugan, 2013). Reasons given for using online dating include: reducing loneliness, seeking companionship, emotional support, a soulmate, sex, as well as looking for fun, to ease boredom, to get over a break up, or because it seems like a good way to meet new people (Couch & Laimputtong, 2008; Korenthal, 2013; Lawson & Leck, 2006).

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 2 Online dating also appears to be a gendered domain (Lawson & Leck, 2006; Schubert, 2014). Heterosexual women report using online dating in order to seek friendships and serious long-term relationships (Hayden & Farvid, forthcoming; Korenthal, 2013; Netimperative, 2005; Schubert, 2014), while heterosexual men are more likely to note they are also looking for a “no strings fling”, or seeking dates with a sexual component (Gunter, 2008; Netimperative, 2005). While women wait to be approached by men in online dating sites (Hayden and Farvid, forthcoming), men tend to instigate such contact (Dawn & Farvid, 2012).

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 2 Online dating provides women greater access to a larger pool of potential male partners (Korenthal, 2013). The process of choosing a date involves a system of filtering (where women cull the least desirable candidates based on physical appearance, occupation, and location) and a screening system (where background checks or further online contact determine whether a man is worthwhile or safe to meet face-to-face) (Lever, Grov, Royce & Gillespie, 2008; Padgett, 2007). The face-to-face meeting is the ultimate test which then determines if a relationship forged online will continue off-line (Padgett, 2007).

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 1 Women report online dating allows them to be more considerate as well as assertive regarding partner selection (Schubert, 2014; Korenthal, 2013). The anonymity online dating provides has also been identified as a positive factor. For instance, if an off-line date (made online) does not work out, men are typically not part of women’s daily social or work networks, and this deters unplanned or awkward future meetings (Lawson & Leck, 2006; Schubert, 2014).

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 1 Alongside such positive features, a number of risks or difficulties have been identified regarding women’s online dating. These include being financially scammed, deception regarding men’s characteristics or relational status, being harassed by rejected men, emotional costs, as well as being on the lookout for dangerous or predatory men (AnKee & Yazdanifard, 2015; Couch, Liamputtong & Pitts, 2012; Lawson & Leck, 2006; Padgett, 2007). As Hayden and Farvid (forthcoming) note: “Women’s online dating experiences depict a struggle between both the dangers and pains, or pleasures and excitement (Vance, 1984)…of meeting someone to have a long-term relationship with” (p. 66).

Technologically Mediated Intimacies: Dating Apps

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 Online dating has recently been supplemented by many mobile dating apps (e.g., LOVOO, SKOUT, Tinder, Zoosk) which are proving to be highly popular among heterosexual women (Yantis, 2011). The existent literature on dating apps has largely focused on Grindr, which was released in 2009, and is marketed at men who have sex with men. This research has either been quantitative and primarily focused on sexual disease (e.g., Rendina, et al., 2013; Su et al., 2015) or qualitative and interested in the social, relational or subjective aspects of Grindr use (e.g., Blackwell, Birnholtz & Abbott, 2014; Brubaker, Ananny, & Crawford, 2014).

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 1 The qualitative work has noted that Grindr redefines that boundaries between physical location and online space – producing a layering of space and place that is unique to location-aware dating apps (Blackwell et al., 2014). Users report enjoying being able to use the app while travelling to meet people from the same sexual community. While some men use it exclusively for obtaining sex, others use it to chat with other men and explore their sexual identity (Blackwell et al., 2014). Although some men value Grindr as a useful platform for meeting new people, for making friends, and procuring relationships or casual sex, others noted that the app objectified men, was distracting as well as time-consuming (Brubaker et al., 2014). Some men also reported frustrations regarding the difficulty in telling if users were genuine or merely using the app for curiosity and entertainment (Blackwell et al., 2014).

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 1 Although there is limited research on men’s use of Grindr, research on the heterosexual use of dating apps is scarce. To begin addressing this gap, we present data from a small project on young heterosexual women’s experiences of Tinder use in NZ. We explore how young women’s Tinder use evoked or disrupted dominant constructions of heterosexual femininity. We also interrogate whether Tinder created more opportunities for the women to explore their sexuality, or if it intensified the spectre of risk, as touted by the media. Overall, we seek to critically make sense of women’s Tinder use, in the contemporary sociocultural context.


16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 Recruitment and Participants

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 1 Participants who took part in this study were five heterosexual women aged 20-25 (M=22.8), recruited through advertisements and word of mouth. The participants were: one Indian woman, one South African woman and three Pākehā women (non-Māori New Zealanders of European descent). Three of the participants worked in the health sector; one worked with youth, and one participant was an undergraduate student. The length of time women had spent on Tinder varied from three months to two years. Ethical approval for the project was sought and gained from the host tertiary institution.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 Data Collection

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 3 Participants were interviewed by the second author using a semi-structured style of interviewing. The interviewer was of a similar age to the participants (23 years of age) and Pākehā. The interview questions were open-ended and asked about the practical process of using Tinder and women’s firsthand experiences of chatting to and meeting men from Tinder. Interviews ranged from 30 to 53 minutes, were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim (producing 111 pages of data). Transcripts were anonymized before analysis, with all identifying information removed or altered (all names are pseudonyms).

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 Data Analysis

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 This project is situated within a critical realist epistemological approach which acknowledges that an independent reality may exist beyond our understanding of it (Houston, 2001), but posits that social and institutional structures impact what we conceive as reality (McEvoy & Richards, 2006). Critical realism allows for an in-depth and critical examination of social phenomena while allowing the researcher to make claims about the real life effects of research outcomes (Easton, 2010). Located within this framework, an inductive Thematic Analysis (TA) was used to analyse the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2012), from a critical feminist perspective (Farvid & Braun, 2013, 2014). TA allows researchers to make sense of a large set of textual data, establishing patterns and links across that dataset (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Inductive TA means that the data itself was used to derive the structure of the analysis (rather than fitting the data into pre-determined categories). Although the data was largely analysed at a semantic (or surface) level, looking at the explicit language and meanings conveyed by the women, it went beyond that to examine the cultural ideologies or discourses that informed this talk. TA is a recursive process that involved: familiarization with the data through repeated reading; identifying initial codes of interest within the dataset; searching for themes and organising the codes into themes; reviewing the themes; defining and naming the themes; and finally, producing the report (Braun & Clarke, 2006). This analytic process was carried out by the second author, in full consultation with the first author.

Results and Discussion

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 Tinder was described as a new and novel but contradictory and contested site of varied use. Four themes were identified that reflect this tension: Tinder as a new landscape; Tinder as a multipurpose tool, Tinder as a risky domain and new technology, old norms? We discuss these below.

Tinder as a New Landscape

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Tinder was portrayed as a relatively ambiguous interface that was vastly different to other forms of online communication:

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Bella: It’s a really interesting app, it’s very different, like it’s nothing, it’s not like a chat room or anythin- like any weird sort of online dating site (KA: uh huh)…it’s very like (pause) good for our generation ‘cause it’s the sort of, it’s on the sort of um software…that we use daily like on phone apps, so yeah I liked that about it. That was something that interested me in Tinder (Age: 20)

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 Bella contrasts “weird” online dating to “interesting” Tinder. Primarily due to its mobile software technology, Tinder was seen as an app suited to Bella’s generation. Tinder was also contrasted with online dating in terms of purpose and usability:

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 Sarah: I’ve never used Internet dating before, so I don’t really know the ins-and-outs of it, so I feel like it’s more for serious relationships and like this is my star sign (laughing) and this is my future goals (Age: 25)

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 KA: What do you see as the benefits of Tinder?

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 Brooke: Um I think it’s sort of like, I don’t know I guess it’s kind of quick and easy (laughter) like it’s not like Internet dating where obviously you have to be like sitting down at a computer (Age: 23)

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 2 Here, Tinder is portrayed as quick, easy and simple to use, in contrast to online dating which is more thorough and labour intensive. Unlike PC-based online dating, Tinder can be used ‘on the go’ and is not seen as geared towards only finding serious relationships; portraying it as more casual and less complicated. The women also spoke of online dating as carrying more social stigma than Tinder. Online dating was portrayed as for “desperate and “older” people, whereas Tinder was talked about as “new”, “cool”, “modern” and for younger people (Sarah).

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Tinder was talked about as not only socially acceptable, but its use was encouraged within the women’s peer groups:

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 Cassie: I was always like to my friends like guys how are you meeting people it’s so unfair and they’re like just get Tinder! (Age: 21)

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Sarah: Like my friend and her boyfriend were like yeah you have to do this and they like sat down and made my profile for me (Age: 25)

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 1 Observing others’ success with online dating has been reported to encourage women to also try it (Korenthal, 2013), something we about Tinder. Furthermore, rather than being a hidden activity carried out in solitude (like online dating), Tinder use was something that the participants talked about, and used, with friends.

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Tinder was also seen as an extension of other popular social media platforms:

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Bella: It’s accepted, it’s a completely accepted thing, it’s just as accepted as like Facebook or Snapchat (Age: 20)

36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 1 In comparing Tinder to Facebook and Snapchat, Bella bolsters its acceptability, aligning it to popular social media apps, rather than conventional online dating or other matchmaking technology. Tinder thus occupied a unique hybrid status, as both social networking tool and dating app. Such dual functioning produced a precarious user landscape, where the social norms of Tinder were not clearly established, and women reportedly engaged in guesswork to decode men’s profiles to decipher their intentions:

37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 Cassie: It’s kind of like what are you in it for? Like do you just want like a casual root? Or do you want like to hang out? Or do you want you know to have like a relationship? So I guess there’s kind of, like I find it’s a bit different [to a conventional date]‘cause on a Tinder date you try and suss them out like, but if you’re on a date you just, I don’t know, you just kind of be yourself and um get to know them normally (Age: 21)

38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Cassie contrasts Tinder dates with conventional dates, where the norms or social scripts are well-established. The purpose of Tinder and the intentions of its users were not always clear, and the app could be used to instigate various relational ties (e.g., friendship, casual sex, committed/romantic relationships). Tinder itself advertises the interface as a platform that promotes forming friendships, relationships and “everything in between” (Tinder.com), but the app does not provide categories regarding what users are seeking which creates uncertainty.
Due to such ambiguity, the app was also seen as a lot more casual and obligation-free than conventional dating:

39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 KA: What are the benefits of Tinder?

40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 Sarah: Umm mainly that you don’t, there’s no obligation to like talk to them after like if I end something I don’t have to worry about seeing them or running into them or having to maintain some sort of friendship if I don’t want to…or if I do want to then I can there’s no like pressure, there’s just yeah, it’s just a lot more casual (Age: 25)

41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 1 Tinder allowed women greater anonymity, involved fewer obligations and a ‘cleaner break’ if they were not interested in someone. This was both digitally (women could un-match a match), or following face-to-face meetings. Men on Tinder were not usually connected to the woman’s daily lives or social networks, which the women appreciated (Korenthal, 2013). Meeting via conventional means involved pressures that Tinder, to some degree, was alleviated from.

Tinder as a Multipurpose Tool

42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 0 The women largely spoke of Tinder favourably, reporting it was a useful tool in a variety of ways. Tinder was often talked about as helping women move on from past relationships:

43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 0 Annie: I personally was just looking to see what all the fuss was about and this is going to sound really bad but I had just broken up with a boy who um was a bit nasty (KA: uh huh) and it was kind of like not revenge, because he didn’t know I was doing it, but like for like satisfaction within myself (laughing)…like oh yeah other guys do find me attractive you know? ‘Cause you’re kind of mourning the like loss of a relationship and it’s that you know there are other men who find me attractive and…just kind of [a] reassurance and that you still got it (Age: 25)

44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0 Research has previously documented the use of technology for meeting people, after the dissolution of a relationship (Couch & Laimputtong, 2008; Lawson & Leck, 2006). In our interviews, male attention on Tinder (after a break up) was a valued short-term distraction that resulted in feelings of desirability for women. This positive affect ties into the broader sociocultural context where women’s heterosexual desirability (to men) is bolstered as one of the most important aspects of their feminine identity (Gill, 2009).

45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0 Linked to this desirability, others noted that Tinder provided them with a quick ego boost:

46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0 Cassie: It was kind of, it was a bit of a confidence boost when you first get like, your first match (Age: 21)

47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0 Bella: It’s good for someone who has just been broken up with or has broken up with someone and is looking for like confidence boost (Age: 20)

48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0 The women also reported using the app to seek a variety of relational and sexual unions:

49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 0 KA: Ok, um what kind of relationships have you sought?

50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0 Sarah: (laughter) They’ve been sexual most of them (laughing) yeah (Age: 25)

51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0 KA: What kind of relationships have you sought on Tinder? Sexual, or relationships or just casual, friends-

52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0 Annie: (overlapping) All of the above, all of them yeah, I’ve come across all of them (Age: 25)

53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 0 Bella: I wasn’t looking, I was looking for a sort of um, not a relationship relationship, like I wasn’t looking for anything serious (KA: uh huh) but I was looking for something that was more than just like a hook up or something like that. I wanted to have like, obviously you can build a friendship with someone (KA: uh huh) that’s a little bit more than a friendship but not quite a relationship so you’ve got the, like you care for each other and you can sleep together (Age: 20)

54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0 The above extracts demonstrate the diversity of responses regarding the types of relationships women procured on Tinder. The women did not typically use Tinder to find longer-term romantic relationships (even if some Tinder matches eventually became boyfriends). Women’s lack of focus on committed relationships is in contrast to the online dating literature (e.g., Gunter, 2008; Schubert, 2014). Tinder was a multipurpose tool that facilitated various relational or sexual possibilities, many of which were navigated on a case-by-case basis. Tinder offered women a platform to experiment with casual sex and other in-between- relationship scenarios (like the one Bella articulates above). The quick and easy interface offered by Tinder, coupled with anonymity and access to otherwise unknown men, provided women the opportunity to explore multiple sexual and relational ties. In this way, traditional discourses of passive and responsive femininity were disrupted as the women openly described multiple desires and the purposeful pursuit of those (Byers, 1996; Farvid, 2014).

Tinder as a Risky Domain

55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 1 Alongside its usefulness, and akin to previous online dating research (AnKee & Yazdanifard, 2015; Couch et al., 2012; Lawson & Leck, 2006), the women talked about Tinder as a risky domain. The notion of risk was invoked in two ways. Firstly, all women relayed (always) being on the lookout for any potential signs of danger and taking measures to make sure they did not put themselves in harm’s way. Secondly, risk was apparent in stories where things had gone wrong or the women felt they could be in danger.

56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 1 An awareness danger was a ubiquitous part of using Tinder for the women:

57 Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0 Bella: I personally have never [been deceived] and none of my friends have ever been fooled or anything on Tinder, we have all just been really careful so we’re all just, meet someone at a public place and like we’ll meet them, meet up with them more than once in a public place before we actually you know go home with them or go to a more like private place (Age: 20)

58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0 Brooke: I don’t use it for just sex (laughing) (KA:right) I think for a girl that could be quite risky because there’s so many unknowns. I guess like you don’t know the person, you don’t know if you invite them to your house then suddenly they know where you live or if you go to their house your kind of like putting yourself in the middle of a complete you know strangers house where you literally have no idea what could happen (Age: 23)

59 Leave a comment on paragraph 59 2 These extracts outline the potential dangers and spectre of risk the women considered. In a social context that places the burden of keeping safe on female victims, the women discussed various screening processes they employed to reduce the chances of encountering risk. For example, women reported accessing men’s other social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat) to do ‘detective work’. This involved analysing men’s photos, friends list, and posts, to determine if a man was safe to meet in person. This is a new kind of background checking (Padgett, 2007) that the women engaged in, to feel safer meeting men in person.

60 Leave a comment on paragraph 60 0 The reported risk of using Tinder ‘on the ground’ involved: deception, disappointment and men behaving badly. Deception was a common risk spoken about by the women and included being deceived about someone’s appearance:

61 Leave a comment on paragraph 61 0 Annie: But he looked nothing like his pictures… in his pictures he like had hats on and sunglasses on in all of them and he looked like quite like attractive, and then, but I actually after the date went back and like looked through his profile again and I was like, kind of like oh you cheeky bugger (outbreath)‘cause he had done it quite strategically (Age: 25)

62 Leave a comment on paragraph 62 0 In an online forum, users can provide a curated image of themselves that does not always reflect physical reality (Couch & Liamputtong, 2008). At times, men did not live up to the women’s expectations:

63 Leave a comment on paragraph 63 0 Cassie: I met up with this guy and he seemed really nice and he was really attractive…Well I thought he was and um we were texting heaps and we like, he seemed really funny over text and then I met him and he was just not what I expected. He was shorter than what I thought he was and he was uglier and he just like wasn’t as funny and I was just like not into it at all! (Age: 20)

64 Leave a comment on paragraph 64 0 The incongruence between a conjured image did not always match the reality women encountered when meeting men in person. An individual’s linguistic tone, expressions, mannerisms and body language are not always conveyed well over online textual communication (Couch et al., 2012), and the women noted that at times the reality was much more disappointing than the fantasy created via online contact.

65 Leave a comment on paragraph 65 0 Another risk was encountering abusive or aggressive men, particularly in response to rejection. For example, below Brooke described an experience where a man from another city came to visit her (in her home). Once they met in person, she expressed to him that she was no longer interested, to which he reacted badly:

66 Leave a comment on paragraph 66 0 Brooke: I could tell that he was angry um I mean I guess, he didn’t show any like physical aggression to me or anything like that, it was just more verbal like kind- it was just sort of like passive aggressive like trying not to be close to me and giving me the silent treatment for ages and then when he finally did say something he was quite like I don’t know abrupt about it and just like well I think you’re kind of a bitch for doing this (Age: 23)

67 Leave a comment on paragraph 67 0 Similarly, Sarah describes a scenario where a man she had been chatting to on Tinder reacted negatively to her disinterest in meeting him in person:

68 Leave a comment on paragraph 68 0 Sarah: Yeah took it really badly, so I guess it’s like, he was just like ‘what the fuck’? And I gave him the old boyfriend excuse and he was like ‘it’s never going to work out with you two’ and sent like these really agro like, (laughter) three long messages and like, it was like I had never met the guy and it was just, like it was really weird (Age: 25)

69 Leave a comment on paragraph 69 0 Sarah also noted that at times men would not take “no for an answer” and were “hard to shake off”. Below, Bella describes another man who was outright sexist and threatening:

70 Leave a comment on paragraph 70 0 Bella: There was this one guy on Tinder who I think my friend had also matched with on Tinder and he was just like such a pig, like just the things he would say like um, I think to my friend he actually referred to raping her or something (Age: 20)

71 Leave a comment on paragraph 71 0 These accounts are quite telling regarding the dating terrain that heterosexual women negotiate. A domain where men may act entitled to have access to the women they desire and lash out in a variety of ways if women reject such advances (Gavey, 2005).

72 Leave a comment on paragraph 72 0 Some women relayed stories where, in hindsight, they felt they may have put themselves at risk:

73 Leave a comment on paragraph 73 0 Sarah: Yeah the people I have met up with, I try to meet in public places and like during the day or like somewhere where there’s, where you can get away if you need to kind of thing (KA: yup) like in like a bar so I can like drive away…but the first person I met I was, it was at their place cause we couldn’t decide on where to go so we just meet up at his place and then yeah which was a bit silly in hindsight, but it yeah worked out ok (laughing) (Age: 25)

74 Leave a comment on paragraph 74 0 Cassie: We were like chatting he was like oh come over I’ll make you dinner and I was like woah like I am not going to your house on the first date! You are crazy. I was like [let’s] get a drink first um so we met for a drink and then we left and he’s like I have weed in my car do you want to get high and I was like oh ok (laughter) so we went to his car and like he rolled this joint in his car and we walked along my road (KA: yup) and we just walked up and down the road like smoking this joint and then he came back to mine (Age: 20)

75 Leave a comment on paragraph 75 2 These extracts above demonstrate the tenuous way women talked about negotiating their way through meeting strangers off Tinder. In a neoliberal social context that places the responsibility of keeping safe on the individual (Rose, 1996), women described being aware of the spectre of risk, but not always choosing options that fully minimised danger. These accounts highlight the complex and contradictory ways actions and personhood played out in relation to Tinder use. The realm of desire, pleasure, identity and human interaction is complex, creating fraught and (at times) what seemed like questionable choices by the women (that luckily did not end badly). What is striking in such accounts is the way in which women (anxiously) traversed the thorny domain of young female heterosexuality, which continues to be fraught as a site of both pleasure and danger for them (Farvid & Braun, 2014; Vance, 1984),

New Technology, Old Norms

76 Leave a comment on paragraph 76 0 Even though Tinder was talked about as a new technological landscape where the women could explore diverse sexual and relational desires, traditional gendered norms at times permeated the accounts. One striking moment of this was that once a match was made, the women remained passive and men were expected to initiate the conversation:

77 Leave a comment on paragraph 77 0 Sarah: If you match someone I just don’t talk to people unless they talk to me first (Age: 25)

78 Leave a comment on paragraph 78 0 Cassie: I’m just kind of swiping through and I get a match and, I don’t do much about it I just like kind of wait (Age: 21)

79 Leave a comment on paragraph 79 0 So although women could actively “like” the men they desired, once they were liked back, they waited for the men to make the first move. Annie explicates why this may be the case:

80 Leave a comment on paragraph 80 0 Annie: I think there’s just like an expectation for it to be that you know like the guys are meant to do the hard work…you know it’s kind of like the new age thing of Tinder but there’s still the old school train of thought like the guy should make the first move (KA: yeah) so it’s kind of tradition with new technology put together… I would kind of be like if they want to talk to me they will talk to me kind of thing and it would be like if I was really desperate and bored that I would start conversation like if I was really scraping the barrel (laughter) (Age: 25)

81 Leave a comment on paragraph 81 2 Similar to previous research on casual sex (Farvid & Braun, 2014) and online dating (Hayden and Farvid, forthcoming), women created desirable profiles, chose who they liked, but stopped short of initiating contact with men. The traditional gender norm of men as initiator and women as passive and responsive to his sexual advances was evident within these accounts (Byers, 1996; Gagnon, 1990). There was a fine line between being pleasingly assertive, versus aggressive (that is, unfeminine), or desperate; a tightrope of appropriate femininity (Farvid & Braun, 2006) that the women worked hard to master.


82 Leave a comment on paragraph 82 1 In this paper, we have presented the complex and contradictory ways five young heterosexual women traversed technologically mediated intimacies via Tinder. Based on our analysis, we argue that women’s Tinder use needs to be understood as situated within a broader context where dating and sexual relationships are exciting, fun, pleasurable, as well as fraught, risky and even dangerous (Farvid & Braun, 2013; Vance, 1984). Although Tinder offered a new and novel technological domain where women could have access to a wider pool of men and explore their sexuality, the app also re/produced some traditional discourses of gendered heterosexuality. We argue that Tinder may offer more opportunities, but does not necessarily create more risks, albeit ostensibly amplifying risks that already exist in the dating world for young women. In addition, one important way that discussions around such risks need to be reframed is to focus on the perpetrators rather than the victims of abuse, threats or assaults.

83 Leave a comment on paragraph 83 2 Tinder occupied a unique place in heterosexual women’s sociability. It was a unique social networking/online dating hybrid that was navigated with great tact. Further research is needed to examine the process, applications and implications of Tinder use across different geographical sites and intersectional axes (age, gender, sexual orientation), to make better sense of this new mode of technologically mediated intimacies.


84 Leave a comment on paragraph 84 0 AnKee, A., & Yazdanifard, R. (2015). The review of the ugly truth and negative aspects of online dating. Global Journal Management and Business Research, 15(4), 1-7.

85 Leave a comment on paragraph 85 0 Beres, M., & Farvid, P. (2010). Sexual ethics and young women’s accounts of heterosexual casual sex. Sexualities, 13(3), 378-393. doi:10.1177/1363460709363136

86 Leave a comment on paragraph 86 0 Blackwell, J., Birholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2014). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media and Society, 1-20. doi: 10.1177/1461444814521595

87 Leave a comment on paragraph 87 0 Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3. 77-101.

88 Leave a comment on paragraph 88 0 Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The “fair deal”? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237-261.

89 Leave a comment on paragraph 89 0 Brubaker, J. R., Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2014). Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814542311

90 Leave a comment on paragraph 90 0 Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25.

91 Leave a comment on paragraph 91 0 Cohen, E. (2015). Tinder, social media blamed for spike in STDs. Retrieved January 20, 2016 from http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2015/09/29/tinder-social-media-std-rise.cnnmoney/index.html

92 Leave a comment on paragraph 92 0 Couch, D., Liamputtong, P., & Pitts, M. (2012). What are the real and perceived risks of online dating? Perspectives from online daters. Health, Risk & Society, 14(7-8), 697-714. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2012.720964

93 Leave a comment on paragraph 93 0 Dating NZ. (n.d.). Tinder app review. Retrieved July 6, 2015, from http://www.datingnz.net.nz/site-reviews/tinder-app/

94 Leave a comment on paragraph 94 0 Dawn, D., & Farvid,P. (2012). “Trawling for a girlfriend” Heterosexual men’s experiences on online dating in Aotearoa New Zealand. In the 10th Dangerous Consumptions Colloquium. Auckland, New Zealand.

95 Leave a comment on paragraph 95 0 De Peak, S, (2014). Warning after Tinder date rape. Retrieved January 20, 2016 from http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/62303684/warning-after-tinder-date-rape

96 Leave a comment on paragraph 96 0 Easton, G. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 118-128. doi:10.1016/indmarman.2008.06.004

97 Leave a comment on paragraph 97 0 Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114-131. doi:10.1177/0959353509351854

98 Leave a comment on paragraph 98 0 Farvid, P. (2014). “Oh it was good sex!”: Heterosexual women’s (counter)narratives of desire and pleasure in casual sex, In S. McKenzie-Mohr and M. Lefrance (Eds.) Women Voicing Resistance: Discursive and Narrative Explorations (pp. 121-140). Hove: Routledge

99 Leave a comment on paragraph 99 0 Farvid, P. (2015). Heterosexuality. In C. Richards & M. J. Barker (Eds.), The Palgrave Book of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender (pp.92-108). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

100 Leave a comment on paragraph 100 0 Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of us guys are raring to go anytime, anyplace, anywhere’: Male and female sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55(5-6), 295-310.

101 Leave a comment on paragraph 101 0 Farvid, P. & Braun, V. (2013). Casual sex as not a natural act and other regimes of truth about heterosexuality, Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 359-378. doi: 10.1177/0959353513480018

102 Leave a comment on paragraph 102 0 Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2014). The “Sassy Woman” and the “Performing Man”: Heterosexual casual sex advice and the (re)constitution of gendered subjectivities. Feminist Media Studies, 14(1), 118-134. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.724027

103 Leave a comment on paragraph 103 0 Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (forthcoming). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard.

104 Leave a comment on paragraph 104 0 Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–43.

105 Leave a comment on paragraph 105 0 Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.

106 Leave a comment on paragraph 106 0 Gill, R. (2009). Supersexualise me! Advertising and ‘the midriffs’. In F. Attwood (Ed.), Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Culture (pp. 93-109). London: I. B. Taurus.

107 Leave a comment on paragraph 107 0 Gunter, B. (2008).Internet dating: A British Survey. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 60(2), 88-98. doi: 10.1108/00012530810862437

108 Leave a comment on paragraph 108 0 Hayden, K. & Farvid, P. (forthcoming). “It is like conventional dating on steroids”: Women’s experiences of online dating in New Zealand

109 Leave a comment on paragraph 109 0 Hodges, Q. (2015). Former LSU student indicted in alleged ‘Tinder rape’ of Baton Rouge woman. Retrieved January 20, 2016, from http://www.nola.com/crime/baton-rouge/index.ssf/2015/01/former_lsu_student_indicted_in.html

110 Leave a comment on paragraph 110 0 Holloway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: SAGE.

111 Leave a comment on paragraph 111 0 Houston, S. (2001). Beyond social constructionism: Critical realism and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31(6), 845-861. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.6.845

112 Leave a comment on paragraph 112 0 Hume, M. (2015). Police probe two Tinder date attacks in Christchurch. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/72625132/police-probe-two-tinder-date-attacks-in-christchurch

113 Leave a comment on paragraph 113 0 Jackson, S. (1999). Heterosexuality in Question. London: Sage.

114 Leave a comment on paragraph 114 0 Korenthal, L. (2013). A phenomenological exploration to understanding women’s experiences with online dating (Doctor of Psychology Dissertation). Alder School of Professional Psychology, Chicago.

115 Leave a comment on paragraph 115 0 Lapowsky, I. (2014). Tinder may not be worth $5 billion but it may be more valuable than you think. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/2014/04/tinder-valuation/

116 Leave a comment on paragraph 116 0 Lawson, H., & Leck, K. (2006). Dynamics of Internet dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 189-208. doi: 0.1177/0894439305283402

117 Leave a comment on paragraph 117 0 Leask, A. (2014). Kiwi woman gang-raped in Sydney after she met man on dating app Tinder. Retrieved August 23, 2015, from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11339326.

118 Leave a comment on paragraph 118 0 Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T., & Gillespie, J. (2008). Searching for love in all the “write” places: Exploring internet personals use by sexual orientation, gender and age. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(4), 233-246. doi: 10.1080/19317610802411532

119 Leave a comment on paragraph 119 0 McEvoy, P., Richards, D., (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(1), 66–7.

120 Leave a comment on paragraph 120 0 Netimperative (2005). Internet now third most popular way to get a date. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from http://datingtipsandnews.blogspot.co.nz/2005/08/internet-now-third-most-popular-way-to.html

121 Leave a comment on paragraph 121 0 Newall, S. (2015). Tinder the dating app everyone’s talking about. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://www.marieclaire.co.uk/blogs/543941/tinder-the-online-dating-app-that-everyone-s-talking-about.html

122 Leave a comment on paragraph 122 0 Padgett, P. (2007). Personal safety and sexual safety for women using online personal ads. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 4 (2), 27-37.

123 Leave a comment on paragraph 123 0 Quiroz, P. (2013). From finding the perfect love online to satellite dating and ‘loving the one your near’: A look at Grindr, Skout, Plenty of Fish, Meet Moi, Zoosk and Assisted Serendipity. Human and Society, 37(2), 181-185.

124 Leave a comment on paragraph 124 0 Rendina, J., Jimenez, R., Grov, C., Ventuneac, A., & Parson, J. (2013). Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr. Aids and Behavior, 18(1), 41-49.

125 Leave a comment on paragraph 125 0 Richardson, D. (Ed.). (1996). Theorising Heterosexuality. Bukingham: Open University Press.

126 Leave a comment on paragraph 126 0 Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

127 Leave a comment on paragraph 127 0 Rosenfeld, M., & Thomas, R. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.

128 Leave a comment on paragraph 128 0 Schubert, K. (2014). Internet dating and doing gender: An analysis of women’s experiences dating online (Doctor of Philosiphy Dissertation). University of Florida, America.

129 Leave a comment on paragraph 129 0 Scribner, H. (2014). 5 Tinder stories that will make you believe in love all over again. Retrieved July 6, 2015, from http://national.deseretnews.com/article/1999/5-tinder-success-stories-that-will-make-you-believe-in-love-all-over-again.html

130 Leave a comment on paragraph 130 0 Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating and relationships. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/

131 Leave a comment on paragraph 131 0 Sritharan, R., Helipern, K., Wilbur, C.J., & Gawronski, G. (2009). I think I like you: Spotaneous and deliberate evaluations of potential romantic partners in an online dating context. Europeon Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 1062-1077. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.703

132 Leave a comment on paragraph 132 0 Su, J., Holt, J., Payne, R., Gates, K., Ewing, A., & Ryder, N. (2015). Effectiveness of using Grindr to increase syphilis testing among men who have sex with men in Darwin, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39(3), 293-294. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12342

133 Leave a comment on paragraph 133 0 Vance, C. S. (1984). Pleasure and danger: Toward a politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 1-27). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

134 Leave a comment on paragraph 134 0 Vine, P., & Prendeville, P. (2014). Australia balcony death highlights Tinder risks. Retrieved July 6, 2015, from http://www.3news.co.nz/tvshows/3rd-degree/australia-balcony-death-highlights-tinder-risks-2014101520#axzz3PV6GP3NR

135 Leave a comment on paragraph 135 0 Yantis, J. (2011). With improving technology and decreasing stigma, online dating appears nowhere near saturation. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/20110213online-dating-technology-decreasing-stigma.html#ixzz3UnhnW4cJ

136 Leave a comment on paragraph 136 0 Yi, D. (2015). Tinder’s hookups skyrocketed 300% at Coachella’s first weekend. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://mashable.com/2015/04/15/coachella-tinder-usage-sky-rockets/

Page 23

Source: http://adareview.fembotcollective.org/ada-issue-10-open-issue/its-just-a-lot-more-casual-young-heterosexual-womens-experiences-of-using-tinder-in-new-zealand/